I may only (sic) be a graduate student, but I am lucky to have received excellent tutelage in how to conduct a peer review of a paper. Recently I have had opportunity to be on the receiving end of poor quality reviews. In the interest of full disclosure, I should note that the outcome of the one set of reviews was a 'reject,' and the other an 'accept.'
Really though, the quality of a review is independent of the review outcome. For one can receive a high quality review that results in rejection; or a poor quality review that results in acceptance. Ultimately, all of us in the research game want high quality reviews that end up in acceptance of our work.
Really though, the quality of a review is independent of the review outcome. For one can receive a high quality review that results in rejection; or a poor quality review that results in acceptance. Ultimately, all of us in the research game want high quality reviews that end up in acceptance of our work.
Continue reading How to conduct a peer review..

