Results tagged “journal papers” from Michael Tyworth

Paper published in Information Polity

|
I am coauthor on a paper published in the latest issue of Information Polity.

Abstract:
In this article we offer visual depictions and analysis of contextual factors relative to the presence of public safety networks (PSNs) in the United States (US). A PSN combines shared technological infrastructures for supporting information sharing, computing interoperability and interagency interactions involving policing, criminal justice, and emergency response. The broad research objective is to explain the formation of PSNs based upon factors derived from rational choice and institutional theories. To do so we develop maps to represent our data analysis. This analysis suggests that our approach is promising for generating insights about PSNs and, by extension, about other types of inter-organizational collaborations focusing on using information and communication technologies to enable information-sharing.

Excellent paper on social theory of technology

|
Paul Leonardi and Stephen Barley have written an excellent paper on how we theorize technology and social action.  It is by far the best treatment of this subject I have ever read.

Social theorists of technology continue to battle with issues of materiality and social context, structure and agency.  Leonardi and Barley frame this as a tension between the materialism (artifact) and the idealism (people) and determinism (structure) and voluneerism (agency).  Their analysis shows that theorists tend to favor or lean towards idealism and volunteerism resulting in little to no agency being assigned to the artifact; and that this 'tilting' is a result of conflating materialism with determinism (e.g., if one assigns any agency to the material properties of a technological artifact, one is by definition a technological determinist).

Indeed in my own work I have found that there is an inertial tendency to drift towards the social half of socio-technical.  Part of this I believe is because accounting for both the social and the technical simultaneously is messy, difficult, and ambiguous.  It's difficult to present a parsimonius explanation of a phenomenon when by definition there is more than one contributing factor.  Saying "it's both materiality and idealism" can be dissatisfying.

Key to this article is the argument that materialism matters - a loaded gun retains its lethality independent of whether its used as a hammer - and that theorists need to do a better job of accounting for the affordances and constraints presented by technology's material properties.



Info

Michael Tyworth, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow
College of Information Sciences & Technology
The Pennsylvania State University

Quick Links

Affiliations

Powered by Movable Type 4.3-en

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.